Nonetheless I-20 is shown (equally) side-by-side with I-59 along this segment and drivers consider that they have remained on I-20. Naming it “I-59 S / I-20 W” would make this clear. When other numbered route are diverted onto the interstate, I agree that you cannot list them all. But two Interstate numbers running together for awhile is fairly common. The highway signs do not distinguish one over the other, e.g., I-70 running along I-76 from Bedford to Breezewood.
As I driver, I like to see the route that I am following in the client app.
I agree that converting them to PA would be wrong. Deleting 100% of them is harmless. If one appears to be correctly located, it is probably a coincidence. I don’t have that script, though. But it certainly seem that the same rule could be applied en masse by someone somewhere.
Even with a buffer zone of 25 miles south of the border, a lot of the state could be cleaned up.
With additional criteria like “not updated since created in 2009”, I suspect that all legitimate roads would be safe.
Real roads that cross the border should have a name and likely have been updated since they were first loaded.
Since we’re discussing ramps, the wiki is ambiguous: Ramps
When naming Ramps to state routes, use the SR-111 or the PA-111 formats only.
I’ve been told to keep it consistent and use only the SR-111 format. I think we should decide one way or the other and edit the wiki accordingly. If there is a special exception, then use PA-111.
