This condition occurs by design virtually all the time in cul-de-sacs, so there will be a significant number of false positives.
Is it not enough to visually notice when a bunch of attachment lines converge on a single point where they shouldnāt?
And as for the original request prompting this discussion - closely-spaced HNs that arenāt precisely stacked on top of each other - that can also exist by design when there are a bunch of street-facing units piled close together in real life, so even if some level of logic was developed to detect close-spaced HNs, there might be more false positives where nothing is wrong.
This condition occurs by design virtually all the time in cul-de-sacs, so there will be a significant number of false positives.(unavailable attachment: Capture.JPG)
No, what you have identified is multiple stop points at the same coordinates, not multiple HNs. Two different issues.
And to MajkiiTeliniās earlier point about houses on corners, I should have said āmultiple HNs on the same segment at precisely the same coordinates.ā
However, if identifying these overlaps is going to slow down the script, I fully understand, and can live without it.
Having the numbers available is fabulous, thank you!
However, they are really hard for me to read and Iām sure I wonāt be the only one with old eyes that will complain about it. Configurable would be great, but at the least maybe make the numbers a darker black (they look like dark gray now) and bold? Or try a different font that might be clearer?
Thank you for all of your hard work on this script!